If ice
Science Silence Hadith metaphysics Talk
S CIENTISTS are proud with their scientific discoveries. Science now explains everything in such a way as most scientists now believe. But forget the scientists that science can not explain everything. It only explains how the relationships between certain objects. But there remain a vast world där science with all its history, not to touch it again.
values and value systems and evaluations of things are some examples to explain science där not even dare. Morality and moral codes, där good and evil and dominant is essential for the existence of man. People are not mechanical robots with springs and calculation designs. Good and bad ice in the center of humanity. These criteria decided by the Inter-relationships between people, groups, societies, states, super-states. Science does not affect at all on the morale. It is easy to observe the ITS domain. For example, values as a value-judgment dominated the lives of people outside the domain of science. morality, with their complicated systems of the Last Judgement and Arbitration, a criterion for self-assessment, self-esteem, self-esteem and self-evaluation is also mentioned by scientists note. Scientists with what you discover, as matter of Concerned etiquette. is strictly limited to what they can analyze and observed in the laboratory of experimentation. The scientists want to observe deal in the least with values and morals. People, but life is governed by the criteria of evaluation and morality. Science, measure the distance between two objects, not explain whether such a procedure can be evaluated, even if notice is subject to good and evil. Science is the physical aspect of things and never worried some of the aesthetic or intellectual or moral aspect of objects. Sun deal anatomy biology, chemistry, physics and mathematics with the physical aspect, what is the object of observation. A tree, an animal, a metal, a microbe or a person subject to any physical examination, study, analysis and conclusions. But the aesthetic side of an animal, not plant, metal or a human being is the subject of scientific research, reasoning and conclusion. IT CAN NOT BE are not subject to ScienceDirect ITS checked. science not concerned with value judgments and morality because they can not object of empirical investigation. But knowledge is limited only to the attention to physical chemistry, physics, biology, genetics, nano-engineering or astrophysics. Knowledge-ice, especially with more parties, including the behavior of people. This is on the social sciences, which is not precise or college but left to experimental experience, not scientific yield fruit left. scientific considerations that explain not on scientific evidence, with all his lead today, the scientific evidence for past issues. Ultimate questions with scientific research than with respect to the origin of the objects of scientific concern. What is the origin of a tree, an animal or a human. The source remains a priority Enigmatic, a complete mystery that science is not to discover or reveal. It falls short of explaining the origin of matter, the universe, galaxies and stars, life dimensions. Science does not explain in any way the presence of objects, the presence of the universe and the presence of life itself. The science is in explaining death as the disabled, let alone explain life and its evolution, life, aging and death Hadith. These are the domains of scientific studies reveal But science is not their secrets until the present time. Science with all its scientific discoveries ice unable to explain his first object, namely. What’s up? Science is silent. As the matter has come? Science is silent. What is the origin of matter? Science is silent. How does the structure of matter has arisen? Science is silent. Well, what science is it? notescientific thought doe deal with the most important question for humanity: God is or God is not? Scientist, and his mechanical instruments of calculation and observation of your non-scientific account of the question whether there is a Creator of the universe. They have the knowledge to answer the questions where they come from the universe, object of their scientific research. If you are not with their creation-Concerned, ITS, present, nor with its finality.
finality to ScienceDirect in the real conjecture because it can not be subject to scientific analysis, findings and evidence. Everything has a finality that is done for. An apple tree in the ankle finality Finality Apple itself constitute a species-ice ITS mature adults. Finality, Science IT can not be subject to laboratory examination, remains outside the realm of science and scientific thinking. The plausibility or implausibility of the religious argument is outside the real science because it is not visible, or ask the object of observation, analysis and conclusion. God is not the subject of empirical knowledge to explain the rejection and denial of God by most scientists. In their scientific investigation Do They Do not Need a Good. When Napoleon Bonaparte Laplace questions: “Your work is excellent, but there is no trace of God, in your paper. Lapalce said. “Sir, I need this hypothesis fired for my work”therefore not science concerned with God and therefore rejects God as a hypothesis. But scientists do not even no answers as to scientific or other final questions as the existence of the universe, its origin, its dilution, its control, ITS foundation structures and changes.
Youno answers to two million animal species, their presence, have their next over, its origins and development and finality.
thus the most important issues are not addressed by science. It is at this verycrossroads That Man need ice, his presence, the universe, its originality and that is to explain the origin of the universe. Until science covers such information science is limited and represents, as Stephen Hawking, the astrophysicist, who deny the existence of God, without explaining the origin of the universe, its presence and structure of matter.
realm of metaphysics work directly with the main issues, namely the reality of it all. It deals with the real, and the principles to which all the first principles. God is the first principle of Aristotle is not of Descartes, Bacon and Laplace, who believed in God through faith and tried to reason neglected in his presence. Only metaphysics tries Ash Such ultimate questions and answers. Metaphysics is thus more complete than science that deals only with knowledge of the physical aspect but in all aspects of a thing or object.